Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
here is the quote from the Brembo catalog
"Additionally, all of Brembo's slotted discs are directional, regardless of the vane geometry. The discs should be installed such that the end of the slot nearest the outer edge of the disc contacts the pad first."
There have been lots of countefeit Brembo's on the market in recent years. Brembo went so far as getting permission from ebay to shut down auctions of their products that weren't genuine. They actually had an employee scan ebay for Brembo items and cancel the sale.
"Additionally, all of Brembo's slotted discs are directional, regardless of the vane geometry. The discs should be installed such that the end of the slot nearest the outer edge of the disc contacts the pad first."
There have been lots of countefeit Brembo's on the market in recent years. Brembo went so far as getting permission from ebay to shut down auctions of their products that weren't genuine. They actually had an employee scan ebay for Brembo items and cancel the sale.
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
I guess you are saying that there is a left and right rotor and that they are cut for their individual side. When I look at htchevyii's pic and as you described how it should work, as the tire rotates forward (counterclockwise), the outside tip of the vane will contact the pad first and the rest of the vane will proceed through the pad, until the inner most part of the vane passes throught the pad. If that is how I understand it, that does seem to be the correct rotor for that wheel. Do I have this right?
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
both front and rear pics that I see look like the disc is on the wrong side
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
The pictures (front and rear), are of the Passenger side, unless I'm wrong. In this case, it would be clockwise rotation for forward driving, and Mark's info would suggest that the rotors should be swapped L <--> R. I'm not sure why -- it would be interesting to learn the reason.pope wrote:I guess you are saying that there is a left and right rotor and that they are cut for their individual side. When I look at htchevyii's pic and as you described how it should work, as the tire rotates forward (counterclockwise), . . . .
Alvon
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
LOL, I guess it is the passenger side,its hard to stand on your head while looking at the pic of the rear). I assumed, incorrectly, that it was the driver side. I am also assuming that the four rotors are all exactly the same, which would make the two on the drivers side correct and the passenger side incorrect. I guess it is possible that he has a matched set and just put all four on the wrong sides. We wont know till we see a drivers side shot of a rotor.
Alvon, Brembo shows their rotors as being a matched set, one for the left and one for the right. They are cut differently. Mark did correctly bring this to my attention, as I have only used the generic flat rotors before, that could be swapped on any wheel.
Again...I learn something new every day.
Alvon, Brembo shows their rotors as being a matched set, one for the left and one for the right. They are cut differently. Mark did correctly bring this to my attention, as I have only used the generic flat rotors before, that could be swapped on any wheel.
Again...I learn something new every day.
-
- Patron 2022
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:31 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider hers 1972 Spider his
- Location: Hydesville, CA (NorCal)
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
Um, They are different left & right & I could swap them side to side. They didn't say which way to put them & all the ones that I've noticed are mounted this way. I guess I should do some research. I did make some progress on the rest of the car.
Trey
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
-
- Patron 2022
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:31 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider hers 1972 Spider his
- Location: Hydesville, CA (NorCal)
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
Looks like you may be right & I'll probabily switch them, but this mfg says they can be either way & the fin direction is what really matters. Since ours aren't vented It may or may not really matter.So Cal Mark wrote:both front and rear pics that I see look like the disc is on the wrong side
The StopTech AeroRotors® are directional. If they are not installed on the proper side of the vehicle, airflow will be restricted and cooling will be severely diminished. The vanes on a rotor act like a centrifugal air fan, drawing air from the inside of the rotor and flowing it to the outside. The vanes of a directional rotor should arch back like arms on a pinwheel. On the top side of the rotor, the vanes should curve toward the back of the car.
The slots on StopTech AeroRotors are cut in the OPPOSITE direction of the vanes. The pattern on a drilled AeroRotor also has the same appearance. The direction of the slots or hole pattern should not be used to determine what side of the vehicle to place a rotor. Different manufacturers may have different strategies for slot and hole patterns.
The only correct way to determine what side a directional rotor goes on is the internal vane direction.
Trey
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
-
- Patron 2022
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:31 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider hers 1972 Spider his
- Location: Hydesville, CA (NorCal)
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
I also found this:
IMPORTANT: Pay particular attention to the rotational direction of the drilled holes and slotted vanes. The inner most holes (closest to the hub) contact the brake pad FIRST when rolling forward. This orientation has been verified by Rotorpros.
Note: Different rotor manufacturers may differ in the rotational direction of the holes and/or vanes.
I have emailed the place that sold me mine to see what they have to say.
IMPORTANT: Pay particular attention to the rotational direction of the drilled holes and slotted vanes. The inner most holes (closest to the hub) contact the brake pad FIRST when rolling forward. This orientation has been verified by Rotorpros.
Note: Different rotor manufacturers may differ in the rotational direction of the holes and/or vanes.
I have emailed the place that sold me mine to see what they have to say.
Trey
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
Great looking car - lot of hard work in there!
As for the rotor discussion - slots should run opposite of how the pictures are on the first page. The Brembo description is correct, and is the way almost all manuf. say to install their slotted rotors. The sweep in the direction that Brembo description has it, allows a cleaner and more effective evacuation of pad debris and gasses. When installed the way described for the Brembos, the sweeping action pulls that debris and gas down toward the center of the rotor where it has more open air to escape from the rotor surface. If you install them the opposite way, they force the pad debris and gasses up into the clapier, where it is much harder for them to escape from the rotor surface. All that said, it doesn't really matter that much on a street car.
As for the rotor discussion - slots should run opposite of how the pictures are on the first page. The Brembo description is correct, and is the way almost all manuf. say to install their slotted rotors. The sweep in the direction that Brembo description has it, allows a cleaner and more effective evacuation of pad debris and gasses. When installed the way described for the Brembos, the sweeping action pulls that debris and gas down toward the center of the rotor where it has more open air to escape from the rotor surface. If you install them the opposite way, they force the pad debris and gasses up into the clapier, where it is much harder for them to escape from the rotor surface. All that said, it doesn't really matter that much on a street car.
- kmac33
- Posts: 509
- Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 11:19 am
- Your car is a: 1974 Spider
- Location: Lilburn/Stone Mountain Georgia
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
Very impressive job on the Fiat. I'm currently in the beginning stages of the same process on a 74 Spider that my dad just passed down to me. I hope that I can come close to the very impressive finished product you produced.
Kevin McMullen
1974 Fiat Spider - Restoration Complete! But the mods/refinements continue
1980 Fiat Spider
2013 Subaru WRX
1974 Fiat Spider - Restoration Complete! But the mods/refinements continue
1980 Fiat Spider
2013 Subaru WRX
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
Nice job, the wife's a very lucky lady. I'm picking up a '80 spider this weekend, I already have a '81 that I'll use for parts. I hope to get started on my resto project this weedend. Thanks for posting the pictures, they are very inspiring.
Nolan
Nolan
-
- Patron 2022
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:31 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider hers 1972 Spider his
- Location: Hydesville, CA (NorCal)
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
I just heard back from the brake rotor mfg, here's what they said:
There is no right and wrong way to install it. If the rotors match our picture, we do recommended to be on the driver side for smooth engagement when brak pedal applied. However you can install it on the reverse for the aggressive style driving, thus it'll wear out the pads a little faster and may cause a slight vibration due to agressive engagement.
(The rotor in the picture is the same as the ones that I currently have installed on the driver's side). It makes more sence to me as the centrifical force is going to sling everything outward anyway, but who knows?
There is no right and wrong way to install it. If the rotors match our picture, we do recommended to be on the driver side for smooth engagement when brak pedal applied. However you can install it on the reverse for the aggressive style driving, thus it'll wear out the pads a little faster and may cause a slight vibration due to agressive engagement.
(The rotor in the picture is the same as the ones that I currently have installed on the driver's side). It makes more sence to me as the centrifical force is going to sling everything outward anyway, but who knows?
Trey
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
That's cool, and maybe makes a bit of sense. I've never felt any funny vibrations with similar rotors installed the other way on my Impreza (at speeds over 150mph on track) - but the pad wear is likely very true. One of the main functions of a slotted rotor is to remove glazing from the pad with each pass, which of course removes material.htchevyii wrote:I just heard back from the brake rotor mfg, here's what they said:
There is no right and wrong way to install it. If the rotors match our picture, we do recommended to be on the driver side for smooth engagement when brak pedal applied. However you can install it on the reverse for the aggressive style driving, thus it'll wear out the pads a little faster and may cause a slight vibration due to agressive engagement.
(The rotor in the picture is the same as the ones that I currently have installed on the driver's side). It makes more sence to me as the centrifical force is going to sling everything outward anyway, but who knows?
-
- Patron 2022
- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:31 pm
- Your car is a: 1982 Spider hers 1972 Spider his
- Location: Hydesville, CA (NorCal)
Re: Hello everybody, some pics of my 82 spider
I guess you're right, I just drug home a 48,000 mile '72 that's been in a barn since 1984. I wasn't looking (very hard) for another project, but for $300. had to buy it!So Cal Mark wrote:well there's the link to your user name! I see another Detroit iron convert in the making once you drive the Spider.
Trey
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,
1982 SPIDER 2000, 1964 CHEVYII, 1969 Chevy Nova, 2005 DODGE RAM, 1988 Jeep Comanche
1972 Spider, 78 Spider rat racer 57 f-100,