the 2L build that ... isn't.

Keep it on topic, it will make it easier to find what you need.
Post Reply
User avatar
maytag
Posts: 1789
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:22 pm
Your car is a: 1976 124 spider
Location: Rocky Mountains....UTAH! (Not Colorado)

the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by maytag »

Well all, I finally got around to finishing the dismantling of my parts-car, so I could get the covered parking back for my daughter before snow flies.

I bought this '79 "with original motor" for the 2L motor to build over this winter.
But according to what I find here: http://www.mirafiori.com/faq/fiatcarb_july2004.pdf.... it's not a 2L. Casting #'s above the filter read 132A1.031.5, which makes it an 1800. :evil:

So now I'm faced with a decision: Do I look around some more for a 2L, or do I build the 1800.
I really, really wanted to build the 2L. can anyone weigh-in with an opinion why I should just build the 1800? 'cuz that's what my wife says I should do :roll:

anyone got a spare 2L they want to sell . . . cheap. ?
I'm no Boy-Racer..... but if I can't take every on-ramp at TWICE the posted limit.... I'm a total failure!
User avatar
SLOSpider
Posts: 1140
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:10 am
Your car is a: 1973 124 Spider 2.0FI
Location: Lompoc, Ca USA

Re: the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by SLOSpider »

I dont think youll really notice any power gains between the 2 once your done. Hell my stock 1800 revs through the gears almost as fast as I can shift anyways with the gearing these things have.
1975 124 Spider
1976 Mazda Cosmo http://www.mazdacosmo.com
1989 Chevy k5 Blazer
1967 GT Mustang Fastback
pooldoctorstl

Re: the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by pooldoctorstl »

Check this out:
http://stlouis.craigslist.org/pts/1978292981.html

Probably not as cheap as you want and you'll have a little freight but you'll have a transmission as a spare or to sell and lower the cost.

Jeff
So Cal Mark

Re: the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by So Cal Mark »

I'd choose the 2L every time for a street motor. It's easy to get gobs of torque with the big motors
User avatar
maytag
Posts: 1789
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 9:22 pm
Your car is a: 1976 124 spider
Location: Rocky Mountains....UTAH! (Not Colorado)

Re: the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by maytag »

So Cal Mark wrote:I'd choose the 2L every time for a street motor. It's easy to get gobs of torque with the big motors
yeah, that's kinda what I was thinking.

I'll be on the search then. There are a couple guys on this forum with 2L's for sale, but none in my neck of the woods. I'm looking into freight, but the cost of freight, plus their time crating.... it'd be nice to find one closer to me, within a day's driving distance.
I'm no Boy-Racer..... but if I can't take every on-ramp at TWICE the posted limit.... I'm a total failure!
MNspiderman

Re: the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by MNspiderman »

First of all. If the wife says use the 1800. Then you better go out and find a 2.0 and just tell her its the 1800. That way you can, not listen to her and have a 2 liter at the same time and she will think she won the battle :mrgreen:
Zmatt

Re: the 2L build that ... isn't.

Post by Zmatt »

MNspiderman wrote:First of all. If the wife says use the 1800. Then you better go out and find a 2.0 and just tell her its the 1800. That way you can, not listen to her and have a 2 liter at the same time and she will think she won the battle :mrgreen:
lol. sounds like experience talking.
Post Reply