is the Guibo the cause of this???

Maintenance advice to keep your Spider in shape.
vandor
Posts: 3996
Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:23 pm
Your car is a: 1971 124 Spider
Location: Texas, USA

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by vandor »

No ideal why someone would keep arguing that this can't happen in normal driving. Here's another example on what guibo failure can do. This happened on an old diesel Mercedes, which I'm pretty sure was not going 150 mph and likely was built from thicker metal than a Spider. The driveshaft cut clear through the transmission tunnel.

http://dieselgiant.com/Mercedes%20flex% ... ailure.htm
Csaba
'71 124 Spider, much modified
'17 124 Abarth, silver
http://italiancarclub.com/csaba/
Co-owner of the best dang Fiat parts place in town
User avatar
RRoller123
Patron 2020
Patron 2020
Posts: 8179
Joined: Sun Nov 13, 2011 2:04 pm
Your car is a: 1980 FI SPIDER 2000
Location: SAGAMORE BEACH, MA USA

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by RRoller123 »

holy moly, don't want any part of my body near that.
'80 FI Spider 2000
'74 and '79 X1/9 (past)
'75 BMW R75/6
2011 Chevy Malibu (daily driver)
2010 Chevy Silverado 2500HD Ext Cab 4WD/STD BED
2002 Edgewater 175CC 80HP 4-Stroke Yamaha
2003 Jaguar XK8
2003 Jaguar XKR
2021 Jayco 22RB
2019 Bianchi Torino Bicycle
DieselSpider
Posts: 2130
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:21 pm
Your car is a: 1978 124 Spider with Isuzu Turbo Diesel

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by DieselSpider »

courtenay wrote:Some people just can't let things lie....
Give it up, Diesel. Bottom line for me is that a Guibo change after 30 or so years is probably a good idea whether you have a vibration or not - and regardless of whether you regularly drive 45 or 70 mph on a regular basis. If that sucker lets go, no matter how fast you're going or what fuel you're using, the result is not going to be pleasant.
Just wanted a straight answer instead of the runaround. Was that level of damage from normal lawful driving on a public street or from being pushed passed those levels potentially on a race track. I found I no longer have a Guibo on mine anyway but did not get a straight answer whether what was being presented was on a car being driven on a public road at lawful speeds.

Remember I was questioning the level of damage on what was obviously a fairly highly modded race car really being what you would experience while driving the legal posted speeds not whether the Guibo should be replaced on a regular basis. I have yet to see that level of damage on a street car driven the legal speed limit even in wrecks where the car was flipped over the guard rail during a front drop of the drive shaft.
Ramzi

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by Ramzi »

I apologize if my answer was in any way vague or a runaround. Certainly never my intention. But I believe the below quoted post directly answers your previous post. I think this subject has been adequately addressed.
Ramzi wrote:I personally have never experienced a catastrophic failure.... but have experienced the dreaded telltale of hearing a clunk and spotting a black rubber object in my rear-view bouncing down the highway.

Although torque more than horse power can produce a premature failure of a guibo, neither the guibo or its shrapnel cause the damage. The majority of the damage is caused by the forward section of the driveshaft 'stricking' the transmission shifter extension and tunnel. At that point the torque/HP are no longer a factor.... the only thing that matters is the speed at which the driveshaft is rotating - and that of course a factor of the speed at which the car was traveling when the entire unit fails.

The transmission tunnel damage failure in Csaba's link did in fact occur in a race car - but visually the damage was the same on a street car. I know of 2 such failures on average HP street cars while driven on city streets. These examples are of course the extreme - generally a total guibo failure will just knock off the shifter extension before the driveshaft cuts the tunnel... We have sold plenty shifter extensions over the years for just such a repair.

To err on the side of caution is probably best when it comes to these sorts of parts.

Ramzi
Auto Ricambi
User avatar
azruss
Posts: 3659
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 12:24 pm
Your car is a: 80 Fiat 2000 FI

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by azruss »

I have seen guibos with cracks and chunks out of them and still work fine. It is similar to looking at the warplane torn half to pieces with holes and you wonder how the thing could fly. The real issue here is what kind of damage can be done at failure. This and the timing belt fall in the same category. If either fails the damage becomes extensive, expensive, and a danger to life and limb. Yes, you are putting far more stress on the guibo with a race car and could expect a higher failure rate. This doesn't mean that driving your fiat like a little old lady on Sunday gives you a free pass. the beauty of the guibo is a physical inspection can tell you whether you are ready for a replacement. For our application, age plays a major factor in the reliability of any rubber part, guibo included.
User avatar
toplessexpat
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:29 am
Your car is a: 1976 Spider 1800
Location: Houston, TX

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by toplessexpat »

I think the moral of this tale is that:

If you inspect your guibo and it's got chunks missing out of it, and you know it's 30 years old .... replace it

If you inspect your guibo and it looks perfect and you know it's 30 years old ..... seriously consider replacing it

If you inspect your guibo and it's got chunks missing out of it, and you know it's been replaced recently ..... seriously consider replacing it, looking for guibo-elves that are nibbling at it, and contact your parts supplier

If you inspect your guibo, and it's looking perfect, and you know it's been replaced relatively recently ..... then consider yourself fortunate, but look out for pieces of rubber bouncing in the rear view mirror and/or mysterious clunks from somwhere under the centerline of the car....

For one, I replaced the guibo, universals, center bearing when I got my cars.... you can't guarantee the provenance and it just seems to made sense.

A
---
Many classic Fiats - it's a disease!
www.mirafiori.com
User avatar
4uall
Posts: 4145
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:09 pm
Your car is a: 1980 Fiat Pininfarina Spider 2000 F.I.
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by 4uall »

Image
Jay

Fiona
1980 FI 2000 Spider
ITZEBTZE

https://goo.gl/photos/eNKaX7hrXhBu9fmp6

FINN (FN-2187)
2014 Jeep Wrangler Sport
MYTHERPY
User avatar
toplessexpat
Posts: 1183
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:29 am
Your car is a: 1976 Spider 1800
Location: Houston, TX

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by toplessexpat »

I'm English ... we specialize in such matters :)
---
Many classic Fiats - it's a disease!
www.mirafiori.com
DieselSpider
Posts: 2130
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 10:21 pm
Your car is a: 1978 124 Spider with Isuzu Turbo Diesel

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by DieselSpider »

Ramzi wrote:I apologize if my answer was in any way vague or a runaround. Certainly never my intention. But I believe the below quoted post directly answers your previous post. I think this subject has been adequately addressed.

To err on the side of caution is probably best when it comes to these sorts of parts.

Ramzi
Auto Ricambi
[/quote]

Then I will ask again a bit more clearly (I had move on to this previously)- If the tunnel is that fragile then does it on even a street car behove one to consider a shaft hoop at least on the front section of the shaft to keep it from cutting through especially if one has a higher torque than stock engine or should one possibly consider reinforcing that section of the tunnel to mitigate any chance of this result from a failure of the Guibo itself or its mounting bolts or in my case the modified yoke connection at the transmission? This is ultimately what I am trying to dimension especially since I have a modified drive line and do not know the qualifications of those whom originally did the work. I do not question whether an old or damaged Guibo was unsafe.

Some I have read hold that this is one reason why the torque tube was inherently safer.

Has anyone got any examples of tunnel reinforcments or hoops having been installed on a Spider to mitigate this type of damage?
Last edited by DieselSpider on Sat Mar 07, 2015 12:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
mikeb1223

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by mikeb1223 »

Wow really Lol this is still going on... Its been a few weeks since I got my kit with a HiPo Guibo and I am loving my car now it cruises beautifully about 70
AriK
Patron 2018
Patron 2018
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 7:58 pm
Your car is a: 1979 Fiat Spider
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by AriK »

mikeb1223 wrote:Wow really Lol this is still going on... Its been a few weeks since I got my kit with a HiPo Guibo and I am loving my car now it cruises beautifully about 70
You are welcome! That's what we are here for...some simple advice :mrgreen:
mikeb1223

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by mikeb1223 »

Thank you Arik lmao yeah simple "wink wink" lol
AriK
Patron 2018
Patron 2018
Posts: 1148
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 7:58 pm
Your car is a: 1979 Fiat Spider
Location: Montreal Canada

Re: is the Guibo the cause of this???

Post by AriK »

mikeb1223 wrote:Wow really Lol this is still going on... Its been a few weeks since I got my kit with a HiPo Guibo and I am loving my car now it cruises beautifully about 70
Mike,
I ordered the hiPo guibo kit as well because the regular stuff was out of stock in January. Car is still in storage so i didn't get to compare the both. Have you compared your new and old guibo? Heavier? Stiffer? Does it look like a beefier unit? Will it buy more time for change interval? I didn't buy it for racing or power beatings, but i figured i'd spend the same money on a HiPo rather than wait for the regular unit and pay separate shipping.
Post Reply